Criminological theory on crime prevention

Mohammad Javad Izak Shiri

Abstract


Crime is a social phenomenon that cannot be avoided, according to Emile Durkheim. Even in a society of saints, there will still be crime, although the crimes committed would be different. For instance, something as simple as praying before eating may be considered a crime in such a society. The prevention of crime is crucial since it can have harmful and destructive effects on both the society and the victim when violent crimes are committed against people's physical integrity. Classical and realist criminology sought to prevent crime by focusing on the character of the criminal, emphasizing punishment, and taking preventive and corrective measures. However, this approach tended to ignore the role of the victim in the criminal scene, leading to the failure of offender-oriented criminology. Criminologists have now shifted their attention to the victim and other intervening factors like time, physical environment, human or active caregivers and protectors such as parents, neighbors, teachers, and friends, and non-human or passive protectors such as electronic security systems. To be successful in crime prevention, criminologists and theorists need to adopt a holistic view and take a bird's eye view, considering all the factors involved. Therefore, it is no longer a secret that crime prevention requires a multi-dimensional approach that goes beyond just focusing on the offender and the victim.

Full Text:

PDF 50-56

References


Armitage, R. (2016). Crime prevention through environmental design. In Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 278-304): Routledge.

Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (2013). Crime pattern theory. In Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 100-116): Willan.

Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and justice, 19, 91-150.

Clarke, R. V. (2016). Situational crime prevention. In Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 305-322): Routledge.

Clarke, R. V., & Bowers, K. (2017). Seven misconceptions of situational crime prevention: Routledge.

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American sociological review, 44(4), 588-608.

Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley's critique of situational crime prevention. Crime prevention studies, 16, 41-96.

Cozens, P. (2013). Crime prevention through environmental design. In Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 175-199): Willan.

Ehlert, C., & Rüdiger, T.-G. (2020). Defensible Digital Space. In T.-G. Rüdiger & P. S. Bayerl (Eds.), Cyberkriminologie: Kriminologie für das digitale Zeitalter (pp. 151-171). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Felson, M., & Cohen, L. E. (1980). Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology, 8, 389-406.

Guerry, A.-M., Girard, P.-S., & de Silvestre, A.-F. (1833). Essai sur la statistique morale de la France: Crochard.

Helin, E., & Kellens, G. (1984). Quételet, la morale et la statistique. Déviance et société, 8(1).

Jeffery, C. R., & Zahm, D. L. (2017). Crime prevention through environmental design, opportunity theory, and rational choice models. In Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 323-350): Routledge.

Mihinjac, M., & Saville, G. (2019). Third-generation crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Social Sciences, 8(6), 182.

Miró, F. Routine Activity Theory. In The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology (pp. 1-7).

Miró, F. (2014). Routine activity theory. The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology, 1-7.

Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design: Collier Books New York.

Patel, H., Maynard, I. W., Rana, L., & Chudoba, B. (2022). Strategic Forecasting Toward Achieving Defensible Space Architecture by Year 2030. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 59(5), 1437-1454.

Rosenbaum, D. P. (1988). Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literature. Justice Quarterly, 5(3), 323-395.

Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549-592.

Wilson James, Q., & Kelling George, L. (1982). Broken Windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


World of Researches Publication